The Cross-Border Biotech Blog

Biotechnology, Health and Business in Canada, the United States and Worldwide

Tag Archives: Levine

Corporate Liability Journal Article on Wyeth v. Levine, Reigel v. Medtronic and Medtronic v. Lohr

Check out Jeremy’s latest article, published in the current issue of Corporate Liability Journal.

In The Changing Landscape of U.S. State Tort Liability for FDA-Approved Drugs and Medical Devices (pdf), Jeremy and his co-author, Alison Varga, take a more detailed look at this year’s U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Wyeth v. Levine and Reigel v. Medtronic, which Jeremy has been following on the blog.

Share Button

Preemption Update: Waxman and Pallone Hit the Ground Running

When we reported on the Supreme Court’s decision in Wyeth v. Levine, we wondered what the effect would be on legislation proposed by Reps. Waxman and PalloneWe did not have to wonder long — they introduced legislation yesterday, with a parallel effort from Sens. Kennedy and Leahy, to moot the Supreme Court’s decision in Reigel v. Medtronic and reinstate (har) state tort liability for PMA-approved medical devices.

Bookmark and Share

Supreme Court Rules 6-3 Against Preemption in Wyeth v Levine

The Wyeth v. Levine opinion (pdf) was handed down this morning, holding that state tort law claims (in this case, inadequate warning) are not preempted by the FDCA.  Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion starts at page 30 of the pdf.  Alito and Scalia’s dissent starts at page 54 of the pdf.

Now we have different preemption rules for PMA-approved devices (Reigel v. Medtronic), where state tort law is preempted, than for 510(k) devices (Medtronic v. Lohr) and for drugs (Wyeth v. Levine) where state law claims are still available.

Let’s see where Waxman and Pallone head with this.

Bookmark and Share

Rep. Waxman, Reigel v Medtronic and Wyeth v Levine

Last Summer, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Reigel v. Medtronic that the premarket approval (PMA) process for medical devices pre-empts liability under State common law for claims challenging the safety or effectiveness of medical devices.  Wyeth v. Levine, which the U.S. Supreme Court heard last Fall, but has not decided, makes a parallel argument with respect to labelling of FDA-approved drugs. Together, these two cases could reshape liability for products under the FDA’s purview in a way that looks very much like tort reform, and therefore, have seemed ripe for a legislative response.  A story in yesterday’s Minneapolis-St.Paul Star Tribune includes a statement from Rep. Henry Waxman, D- Calif. that

Waxman and Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., plan to introduce legislation that would circumvent the Supreme Court ruling and “protect Americans from dangerous medical devices.”

and notes that Barack Obama was one of the cosponsors of the Senate bill introduced last year to address the issue. more analysis after the jump…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 126 other followers