<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparative Effectiveness Stimulus Stimulates Reactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crossborderbiotech.ca/2009/02/16/comparative-effectiveness-stimulates-reactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crossborderbiotech.ca/2009/02/16/comparative-effectiveness-stimulates-reactions/</link>
	<description>Biotechnology, Health and Business in Canada, the United States and Worldwide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 04:09:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biotech Trends in 2011: Comparative Effectiveness and Personalized Medicine &#171; The Cross-Border Biotech Blog</title>
		<link>http://crossborderbiotech.ca/2009/02/16/comparative-effectiveness-stimulates-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biotech Trends in 2011: Comparative Effectiveness and Personalized Medicine &#171; The Cross-Border Biotech Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossborderbiotech.ca/?p=551#comment-2589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] often have to do with determining which patient is being treated &#8211; was soon bolstered by the Comparative Effectiveness provisions in the U.S. stimulus bill and new data via the FDA. The proposition has since become common knowledge, culminating in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] often have to do with determining which patient is being treated &#8211; was soon bolstered by the Comparative Effectiveness provisions in the U.S. stimulus bill and new data via the FDA. The proposition has since become common knowledge, culminating in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biotech Trends Update: Costs Savings from Personalized Medicine Sought by PBMs, Employers, Pharma Face Legal and Privacy Hurdles &#171; The Cross-Border Biotech Blog</title>
		<link>http://crossborderbiotech.ca/2009/02/16/comparative-effectiveness-stimulates-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biotech Trends Update: Costs Savings from Personalized Medicine Sought by PBMs, Employers, Pharma Face Legal and Privacy Hurdles &#171; The Cross-Border Biotech Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossborderbiotech.ca/?p=551#comment-1351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to act.  That&#8217;s particularly unfortunate, because government is the closest thing we have to a neutral funding source for comparative effectiveness and personalized medicine research (despite also being a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to act.  That&#8217;s particularly unfortunate, because government is the closest thing we have to a neutral funding source for comparative effectiveness and personalized medicine research (despite also being a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trends in 2009: Comparative Effectiveness Meets Personalized Medicine in the Senate &#171; The Cross-Border Biotech Blog</title>
		<link>http://crossborderbiotech.ca/2009/02/16/comparative-effectiveness-stimulates-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trends in 2009: Comparative Effectiveness Meets Personalized Medicine in the Senate &#171; The Cross-Border Biotech Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossborderbiotech.ca/?p=551#comment-222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] effectiveness advocates in the Obama administration are perfectly on board with point (2), a point I made again when the U.S. Stimulus allocated $1.1 billion to comparative effectiveness rese....  It&#8217;s point (1) that most likely caused the amendment to be (predictably) rejected, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] effectiveness advocates in the Obama administration are perfectly on board with point (2), a point I made again when the U.S. Stimulus allocated $1.1 billion to comparative effectiveness rese&#8230;.  It&#8217;s point (1) that most likely caused the amendment to be (predictably) rejected, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

